[Lazarus] [OT] Pascal's Compilers.

[Frank Church]

On 27 September 2011 05:30, Paul Breneman <list2010 at brenemanlabs.com> wrote:

> Frank Church wrote:
>
>> On 26 September 2011 10:28, Henry Vermaak <henry.vermaak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  On 26/09/11 10:10, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>>>
>>>  On 25/09/2011 04:19, Cristofer Martins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Can anyone explains me why programs generated by Pascal compilers are
>>>>> less fast than programs generateds by  C/C++ Compilers? Is this
>>>>> related with Compilation time? Pascal Compilers compile programs very
>>>>> fast compared c/c++ compilers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  This reminds me of an old joke of making of a Straw Man figure of
>>>> speech...
>>>>
>>>> /When/ will you stop beating up your wife/woman/girlfriend ? (select as
>>>> appropriate)
>>>>
>>>>  This is actually a "loaded question", not a straw man.  But I agree,
>>> Cristofer's question is a great example of this fallacy.
>>>
>>> Henry
>>>
>>>
>>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.**org/u32/pascal.php<http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/pascal.php>
>>>
>>
>> There are always trade-offs.
>>
>> In any case "*Show me the code!!*"
>>
>
> There is a *huge* difference in the "Memory KB" in most cases!
>
>
Yes that part is pretty obvious, but without seeing the program code most of
these comparisons are not very meaningful.

Is c++ memory usage that bad?

>
> --
> ______________________________**_________________
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus at lists.lazarus.**freepascal.org<Lazarus at lists.lazarus.freepascal.org>
> http://lists.lazarus.**freepascal.org/mailman/**listinfo/lazarus<http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus>
>



-- 
Frank Church

=======================
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20110927/dff49232/attachment-0003.html>